{"id":288,"date":"2013-03-05T01:22:50","date_gmt":"2013-03-05T06:22:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/?p=288"},"modified":"2013-03-05T06:49:23","modified_gmt":"2013-03-05T11:49:23","slug":"title-10-authority-and-responsibility","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/2013\/03\/title-10-authority-and-responsibility\/","title":{"rendered":"Title 10, Authority and Responsibility"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[mirror on <a title=\"Intelink-U mirror\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.intelink.gov\/blogs\/drisacher\/?p=195\">Intelink-U<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p>In the DoD, &#8220;<a title=\"Title 10\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/10\">Title 10<\/a>&#8221; is a big deal.\u00a0 &#8220;Title 10&#8221; means Title 10 of the United States Code &#8211; the law that defines the structure of the United States Military. There are other portions of US Law that affect the military &#8211; much of the Federal Acquisition Regulations derive from <a title=\"Title 41\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/41\">Title 41<\/a>. <a title=\"40 USC 11315\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/40\/11315\">Titles 40<\/a> and <a title=\"40 USC 3544\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/44\/3544\">44<\/a> includes stuff about Chief Information Officers of Federal Agencies. <a title=\"17 USC\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/17\">Title 17<\/a> is the Copyright Act, which we have to follow, yadda yadda yadda.<\/p>\n<p>But at the end of the day, in DoD, most people are only familiar with Title 10. Even then, people just say it like it&#8217;s a mantra. &#8220;Title 10, y&#8217;know,&#8221; they sigh discontentedly, as if that explains all the dysfunctions of the day.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Generally, this seems to be some sort of shorthand for the idea that the Military Departments are where all the real power lies. Sometimes the phrase, &#8220;Organize, Train &amp; Equip&#8221; is heard. These phrases are shorthand for the Goldwaters-Nichols Act of 1986, which re-organized the Department and created the Combatant and Unified Commands.\u00a0 (And is codified in Title 10.)<\/p>\n<p>Goldwater-Nichols tasked the Unified Combatant Commands to actually fight the nation&#8217;s wars, and changed the mission of the Military Departments (Army, Navy, and Air Force) to &#8220;Organize, Train and Equip&#8221; the forces which would be assigned to the combatant commands.\u00a0 All the MilDeps have basically the same mission, defined in <a title=\"10 USC 3013\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/10\/3013\">10 USC \u00a7 3013<\/a> (Army), <a title=\"10 USC 5013\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/10\/5013\">10 USC \u00a7 5013<\/a> (Navy), or 1<a title=\"10 US 8013\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/10\/8013\">0 USC \u00a7 8013<\/a> (Air Force).<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the Army one:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>(b) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense and subject to the provisions of chapter <a title=\"Chapter 6 - COMBATANT COMMANDS\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/10\/subtitle-A\/part-I\/chapter-6\">6<\/a> of this title, the Secretary of the Army is responsible for, and has the authority necessary to conduct, all affairs of the Department of the Army, including the following functions:<\/p>\n<div>(1) Recruiting.<\/div>\n<div>(2) Organizing.<\/div>\n<div>(3) Supplying.<\/div>\n<div>(4) Equipping (including research and development).<\/div>\n<div>(5) Training.<\/div>\n<div>(6) Servicing.<\/div>\n<div>(7) Mobilizing.<\/div>\n<div>(8) Demobilizing.<\/div>\n<div>(9) Administering (including the morale and welfare of personnel).<\/div>\n<div>(10) Maintaining.<\/div>\n<div>(11) The construction, outfitting, and repair of military equipment.<\/div>\n<div>(12) The construction, maintenance, and repair of buildings, structures, and utilities and the acquisition of real property and interests in real property necessary to carry out the responsibilities specified in this section.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>All three Military Departments have the same 12 missions.\u00a0 Interestingly too, they all start with the same phrase: &#8220;<strong>Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense&#8230;<\/strong>&#8221;\u00a0 As it turns out, when staff officers in OSD or the Joint Staff sigh and moan that the Services just do whatever parochial thing they&#8217;re gonna do, and oh, Title 10 gives them every authority to do it&#8230; this is a total cop-out!\u00a0 The Services and Defense agencies only have the authority to do things, &#8220;subject to the <strong>authority<\/strong>, <strong>direction<\/strong>, and <strong>control<\/strong> of the SecDef&#8221;. \u00a0I refer to this as the: &#8220;My Title 10 trumps your Title 10&#8221; principle.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is not that the Services or Agencies are parochial &#8211; <em>of course<\/em> they&#8217;re parochial.\u00a0 If they weren&#8217;t parochial, we&#8217;d call them &#8220;Joint&#8221;.\u00a0 The problem (IMHO, of course) is that OSD is so dysfunctional that we can&#8217;t agree what <strong>direction<\/strong> and <strong>control<\/strong> to exert with our <strong>authority<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s clear though:\u00a0 Title 10 says the buck stops at the SecDef.\u00a0 So there&#8217;s no use wringing our hands together and blaming the Services, or the CoComs or the Defense Agencies.\u00a0 Where Title 10 grants Authority, it can&#8217;t help but grant Responsibility too.<\/p>\n<p>If say, there&#8217;s a problem with how we deliver <a title=\"Buying systems vs. providing services\" href=\"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/2013\/02\/systems-vs-services\/\">Enterprise Services<\/a> in the DoD&#8230;\u00a0 ultimately the responsibility to make things right is with the SecDef&#8230;\u00a0\u00a0 somebody in the Office of the Secretary of Defense better get right on that&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>(But don&#8217;t get me started on Title 10 and <a title=\"Title 50\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/50\/403\">Title 50<\/a>.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[mirror on Intelink-U] In the DoD, &#8220;Title 10&#8221; is a big deal.\u00a0 &#8220;Title 10&#8221; means Title 10 of the United States Code &#8211; the law that defines the structure of the United States Military. There are other portions of US Law that affect the military &#8211; much of the Federal Acquisition Regulations derive from Title [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-288","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-work"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=288"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":319,"href":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288\/revisions\/319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/risacher.org\/jfdi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}